av0ider

Besides the fact that you basically look like a complete ass, I have one question for you. How can you see you're joining rooms when you can't get on the site at all? Think quick.

...Except for those of us that have the TinyURL preview cookie set, and are aware of where the link leads.

My suggestion is to delete the whole thing. :]

This may sound a little stupid, but, why are you using a variable in the event?

I see what you did there.

I never said you did know me. I don't care if you know me or not. Enough people know that code is mine for it to make no difference whether or not you had not seen it. I haven't seen anyone back you up yet, dude. -shrugs- Either way, your witty retort presents a logical fallacy - If you were the writer of the code in question, you'd know whether or not I'd ripped it, since it would be your code. The fact that you doubt the providence of the code has just betrayed the fact that you definitely didn't write it yourself. If you'd written yourself, you'd know who owns it.

What's that supposed to mean? I'm shocked and appalled. ;p

I like to know what people think of me.

I do it just to spite you, err0r. <3

Dippy, I'd like to explain a few simple things to you: 1) First and foremost, I'm not Travis. I'm not like Travis, and Travis in no way influences my views or my postings. 2) You know you ripped, even if you think you can escape taking blame. That's enough for me. You've got to be feeling the guilt. 3) About 50% of what you posted is directly copied and pasted. That's not 5 lines, it's a rather large amount more. 4) You were one of the people in a discussion in a channel where I posted what I posted here. You don't have to admit to that, either. You remember it, so do I. That's all that matters. Basically, those four points sum up my argument against you ripping me. You could have asked, and felt less guilty about using it. You could have credited, and felt less guilty about using it. In both of those cases, I would have let you use all the code you liked with no qualms. As it is, you've simply made yourself look foolish, and I assume you feel less proud of yourself for having done this. Be a man. Admit it, and I'll never bother you about it again.

Man, now I want to know what he said. ;(

To be honest, I try not to bother doing anything whenever I can get away with not bothering.

To be honest, I don't need approval - I'd prefer constructive criticism. I also understand you agreeing with Tewl, and there's no real argument with that, beyond what I've already mentioned. I just hope it helps some people out.

No, the compactness of the code reflects the compactness of the code. Less than 1k of information is less than 2k of information, no matter how you set it out. Regardless, I pointed out that the smaller version was more difficult to use, and if you notice, I didn't set it out that way for display - I even said "if you dare". FWIW, it actually would make the code slower, if you stripped it. mIRC actually interprets well-bracketed lines faster than it interprets lines with none, or with poorly conceived bracketing. I think, though, that you missed the fact that Travis and I are just poking fun at each other. ..and I'm sad you didn't say anything about my code. ;(