err0r Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Google on Tuesday said that it plans to drop support for the H.264 video codec in its Chrome browser and to embrace WebM, the video codec that it acquired in 2009 and released last year as open source software. The move is a direct challenge to Apple and Microsoft, which own some of the patent rights associated with H.264. Those rights are managed by MPEG LA, an intellectual property licensing organization. Citing expected innovation in Web technology in the coming year and its commitment to technologies that are developed and licensed using open Web principles, Google product manager Mike Jazayeri said that in a few months, Google will shift to supporting the WebM and Theora video codecs to render video published using the HTML5 video tag and will end support for H.264. (The HTML5 video tag does not require a specific video codec.) "Though H.264 plays an important role in video, as our goal is to enable open innovation, support for the codec will be removed and our resources directed towards completely open codec technologies," said Jazayeri in a blog post. This change is unlikely to be noticed by Internet users, at least initially. Chrome supports Adobe's Flash technology, which will render H.264 video even after Google begins using WebM and Theora in Chrome. Thus Chrome users who view H.264 video once support is discontinued will see H.264 video in a Flash wrapper. This is the way that Firefox currently operates. Google's decision will have an impact on businesses, particularly video publishers, who will have to decide whether to re-encode their videos to deliver optimized content to users of Chrome and Firefox, which will be supporting WebM in its 4.0 release. Some see Google's decision as harmful to HTML5 adoption. Jeff Geerling, a St. Louis, Mo.-based Web developer, said the move is making him consider moving back to Apple's Safari browser. WebM and Ogg (Theora) are not well supported beyond Firefox and Chrome, he said, pointing to professional video software like Apple's Final Cut and Adobe's Premiere as examples of applications that don't deal with WebM or Theora files. "This is a bad move, and will set the adoption of HTML5 video back even further," he wrote in a comment posted to Google's Chromium blog. Others offering comments condemned Google's decision because they believe it will encourage video publishers to use Flash video. That would be bad for Apple because its iOS devices don't support Flash. Faced with a surge of interest in Flash, Apple would probably prefer to accommodate WebM on its devices than to reverse its position on Adobe's technology. If Google's gambit doesn't go well, the company has a nuclear option: Turning off H.264 on YouTube. Though it's unlikely Google would do this -- it would force users of Internet and Safari to switch to Chrome or Firefox (or to install a WebM extension) to view video on the site -- such tactics might become necessary if Apple or Microsoft draw blood through some form of technical retaliation. Such worries may be overstated. H.264 has only a few years left before it is superseded by a new standard. The IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) is considering patents for the H.265 standard. It remains to be seen how Google's backing of WebM will affect this video standards process. Given the slew of patent suits in the mobile arena at the moment, there's an expectation that Google will be sued, sooner or later, for patent infringement related to its video technology (video being particularly relevant on mobile devices at the moment). Intellectual property activist Florian Mueller claims that all the major video codecs are encumbered by patents. Apple CEO Steve Jobs has suggested that a patent pool is being assembled to attack Theora, which Google is now saying it will use. It would hardly be a surprise if this didn't end up in court. Nonetheless, Mike Shaver, VP of engineering at Mozilla and a supporter of open source software, praised Google's announcement and expressed doubts about assertions that WebM is vulnerable to patent claims. "I am confident enough in WebM that we're about to ship it to 400M+ people," he said in a tweet, referring to the forthcoming release of Firefox 4. Source: Thomas Claburn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts