chain

Yeah been been really great helping err0r with this, as right now im in Toronto and will be back on Sunday. so will add more emoticons and add a few more detailed icons. But its been a great experince for me. Love the look and the features. err0r has done a great job on this Multi_conn and just the feel and look is simple and will be quite user friendly and great for advanced user's.

could also be the size of the ico as i have learned working with Cyntax Multi_Conn

I changed my window8 look lol

Ok if your using Buzzen it's %#roomname if its irc its #roomname both working for me bro!! also look into the variables of the script and see if you have this in it %radiotest.room %#AFriendlyChat if it is give it a few mins to play with new song!!

worked for me also in IRC server, maybe you didnt set the channel room correct jeff

I have looked into this chat server and this chat server is alone, has its own hosting and etc, it dose not permitt IRC or mirc to be involed. What Im saying isd this is a server that you eithier have hosting with or you out right buy it at $1999.00 and they set it up for you. you cannot use any client for this chat server. As i have asked as i was interested in this server chat!!

/me kicks d33j4y and Eyecu in the knee caps lol

who invited u Guide_wes lol

dam u need a new floor this one looks old...update it buddy lol

all I got to say to thast comment is !Guide lol

Ok i bought a new laptop a few weeks ago and have windows 8 on it. I always heard that it was really bad and confussing, not to mention wasn't fully completed. Well to my surprise I love it. and i find it quite user friendly and easy to work with. so I'm curious what are other comments on this and tell us what and why u like windows 8 or why you dislike windows 8

Congradulations haggis!!

Happy Birthday karen and all the best on your one and only fantastic day!! hope you have a great day and all the best baby!!

Happy Birthday Wes aka Eyecu all the best bro on your 65th birthday

This year has seen distributed denial of service (DDoS) attackers increase the power of DDsS attacks massively, according to figures exclusively shown to TechWeekEurope. DDoS attacks see servers overwhelmed with traffic, causing a target website to go down. All kinds of organisations use DDoS attacks, from hacktivists like Anonymous to private companies wanting to stymie competition, and figures have shown they are upping their efforts. The average size of an attack went up 27 percent in 2012, hitting 1.56Gbps in June, compared to 1.23Gbps in 2011, second quarter data from anti-DDoS vendor Arbor Networks showed. June average attack speed was 82 percent up on the same month in 2011. There was also a return to growth in super-powered hits, with a 105 percent rise in the proportion of DDoS attacks measuring in at over 10Gbps. Between 2011 and 2010 that proportion was down 34 percent. Multi-vector DDoS attacks Arbor told TechWeekEurope that attackers were increasingly combining big volumetric attacks with stealthy application-level attacks, which are harder to identify due to a lower level of traffic. We are still seeing a lot of the more stealthy application layer attacks going on out there, although now they are quite often accompanied by a volumetric attack. Attackers have learned that by generating application and volumetric attacks (multi-vector ) at the same time they can take sites and services down, and keep them down, for longer periods, said Darren Anstee, solutions architect at Arbor. Using multiple vectors makes it more difficult for operational security teams to figure out exactly what is going on, as different parts of the attack can impact different areas of infrastructure. Application layer attacks target the application servers, state-exhaustion attacks target firewalls, load balancers etc. Despite the rise in DDoS power, the highest powered attacks have hit something of a plateau. The biggest monitored attack so far this year came in at 100.84Gbps, lasting 20 minutes, where 2011 record of 101.394Gbps has not yet been surpassed in 2012. It does appear that on the Gigabit per second side of things, right at the top end, attacks sizes may have plateaued. Why? It could be that 100Gbps of attack traffic is that is required to take down anything that has been targeted thus far, or, we could have reached some kind of limitation in some of the tools, Anstee said. For the first time, the port used for Xbox Live connections (port 3074) showed up on Arbor findings, taking up 0.76 percent of attacks. Port 80, used by the HTTP protocol, is the prime target for DDoSers, with 29 percent of strikes hitting it in Q2. There are unfortunately quite a lot of attacks between on-line gamers (this is multiplayer online gaming, rather than gambling). These attacks are used either to give one player an advantage over another, or avenge a defeat, Anstee added. Botnets lie at the route of the problem, as TechWeekEurope recent investigation into the underground DDoS market found. Law enforcement and industry firms continue to work with one another on knocking down botnets, as seen in last week effort to kill off super-spammer Grum. But most believe arrests are needed to truly counter the rise of malicious networks. Source: TechWeekEurope

Nice old fart eh!!! you will get yours As for Nathan .... LOL

Reason IRC has also dropped is due to my group of peers have hit the age of 50 and just cant be bothered, i guess I'm the one that still acts like a 20 year old and continues with a script site and a IRC server. But people have to also not forget in some places summer time dose drop an increase of chatters and then winter comes we gain from the canadian side of chatters. so in reality its also age and a play of seasons. But as I heard some one say from a movie line Build it they will come. ( LOL )

To be honest i wouldn't even bother, I also have a chat service an IRC one with a webchat and its there, people come in and sit but thats about all we do, as mainly we are all on another chat servers. Its too complicated these days and too much work, but hey if your bored and looking to do something and have to remember that it may all be for notting. then do it!! But if your thinking of gettting chatters its possible as notting is but you need a good percentage of people to get it nice. In which eithier way good luck Dexxa

More than 300,000 people, including many in the US and UK, could lose internet access later as the FBI shuts off servers used by cyber thieves. The FBI seized the servers in November 2011 during raids to break up a gang of criminals who used viruses to infect more than four million victims. Victims' web searches were routed through the servers so they saw adverts that led to the gang being paid. Many machines still harbour the gang's malicious code. Global clean up The gang racked up more than $14m (£9m) by hijacking web searches and forcing victims to see certain adverts. They managed to do this because their servers were taking over a key web function known as domain name look-up. Domain names are the words humans use, such as bbc.co.uk, for websites. These are converted into the numerical values that computers use by consulting domain name servers (DNS). When a person types a name into a browser address bar, often their computer will consult a DNS server to find out where that website resides online. The gang infected computers with malware called DNS Changer because it altered where a PC went to convert domain names to numbers. Since the FBI raids the gang's servers have been run by Californian company ISC. Over the last few months, the FBI has worked with many ISPs and security firms to alert victims to the fact that their PC was infected with DNS Changer. Online tools are available that let people check if they are infected. This has meant the original population of four million infected machines has been whittled down to just over 300,000, according to statistics gathered by the DNS Changer Working Group. The largest group of machines still harbouring the infection are in the US but many other nations, including Italy, India, the UK and Germany, have substantial numbers still checking in with the ISC servers. These servers will be shut down on 9 July. The result could be that some people lose net access because the PCs that are still victims of DNS Changer will suddenly have nowhere to go when they need to look up the location of a particular domain. It might take some time for the problems to apparent, said Sean Sullivan, a security researcher at F-Secure. "Initially some domains will be cached which will mean web access will be spotty," he said. "People will be confused about why some things work and some do not." Other security experts said it might take time for the remaining infected machines to be cleaned up. "Reaching victims is a very hard problem, and something we have had issues with for years," said Johannes Ullrich, a researcher with the Sans security institute. He expected the impact to be "minimal" because many of these systems were no longer used or maintained.

Wow i leave for 2 days and all of this happens. Yes johnson I did say that and look your whinning now!! Oh and to be honest it wasnt you that was in there when I said what I said it was your friend Dippy! Why because Eyecu was helping him with his server and his lightIRC. And we have all helped you in the past Johnson. I don't need a hammer, i just get one LOL. Why you feeling a bit left out? I don't have to hide or chocolate coat my words to anyone, as many know me and see me the way I'am. And you sir are a bit of a cry baby and a person that should try to make a server and a real script. As also you requested to be taking off my site as i said then and say now with pleasure!! Boom it was done. Bench is a great developer and comes in from time to time on my server and we talk and hes happy things have worked out and wont get spoiled. All you people that have these great talks about doing this and doing that ( where is it ? we never see it? ) Oh and by the way i go on alot of chat servers and oh yes I'm Buzzen staff also...Guess I'am bias also..oh wait I have a server...oh and go on koach's sorry guy!! learn to stop babbling and move forward in your life it will allow you to be happy!! ( err0r can you add a picture of a gold hammer for johnson please ) Bye!!

This was interesting and wanted your views on this matter. After reading this it actually brings things in light of your freedom of speech and who controls it. Sysadmin blog Is following someone on Twitter (or friending them on Facebook) an endorsement of that person? Social networking isn't going away, and increased corporate awareness of it means that systems administrators need to be prepared to answer these sorts of murky questions. As a case study, I am going to pick apart my own use of social networks and try to identify potential problem points. I have a Facebook account. Not because I actually use the smegging thing myself, but because part of the service my consulting company offers customers is managing corporate Facebook presences. Being able to see these pages from the viewpoint of a logged-on user is useful. Not actually using Facebook much should theoretically provide a near-zero attack surface; unfortunately, real life is rarely so generous. I made the mistake of letting a relative know that I did in fact have a Facebook account. I was instantly bombarded with an unceasing stream of nagging until I folded and accepted the friend requests. If I log onto Facebook with my user profile to show the customer their Facebook page "as a user would see it", Facebook cheerfully displays all sorts of random inanity from the collection of people on my personal list. Even if we set that aside for a moment, Facebook still pops up a roll of your friends in the weirdest places. "It's a small world" happens to me all too often; I've little interest in having a client become disgruntled because I am associated on Facebook with someone they dislike. How do you explain "they aren't actual friends, they're Facebook friends" to a room full of grumpy middle-aged clients who are allergic to the internet? Now I have two profiles; one to stop the nagging, and one to use for demos. There's more to life than Facebook As soon as my generation – I am nearly 30 – realised our parents were on Facebook, we evacuated wholesale for other sites such as Twitter. As with Facebook, I have two accounts. A sanitised corporate one and my personal account. The corporate account is about as boring as it sounds. The personal account, well... I mostly use that for trolling. I think that it's fairly straightforward to accept that what I write – even when I am just rattling cages – is entirely my responsibility. They are words I chose to tweet; I must live with them forever*. But a murkier question surrounds who I follow. Is it an endorsement of an individual – and by extension all of their speech – to follow that individual? What about following corporate Twitter accounts? If Intel or Microsoft does something spectacularly appalling, is my following them on Twitter an endorsement of the company and thus that company's actions? Some people do indeed see it this black and white. For most, context seems to matter. If you follow thousands of people, you appear to simply be indiscriminately following as much of your industry as possible. Accusations of endorsement are rarer. If you only follow a fraction of the number who follow you – as king-of-the-geeks Wil Wheatondoes – it's much easier to read endorsement into each individual you choose to follow. What about The Register's Twitter account? El Reg gives a (limited) form of endorsement to my sysadmin blog, because it publishes them. (Though they may periodically toss in wise disclaimers of "author's opinion only".) @Regvulture only follows 43 people, all of whom could reasonably be said to be affiliated with Vulture Central in one form or another. Is that endorsement of those individuals or their speech? If I say "product A is a pile of shite", should that blow back on El Reg? When I submit an article toThe Register, I am wearing my professional hat. It goes to a sub-editor and an editor who ensure that nothing truly egregious is slipping through. A medium like Twitter simply doesn't have that. Degrees of separation Younger folks seem to see personal accounts on social networks as entirely personal. We view them as vehicles for personal expression that should be considered separate and distinct from our employers, clients and so forth. Reality unfortunately, doesn't work that way. There are a lot of people – say, your boss – who cannot (or choose not to) separate the two. How do you deal with this reality? One approach is to demand that all employees and contractors always behave in public and online with the utmost professionalism as though they were corporate ambassadors 24/7. Personally, this grinds against my understanding of concepts like "freedom of speech". To ask someone not to speak their mind in their own free time because it might offend a client is in the exact same category as asking someone to always wear floor-length clothing in case someone finds ankles offensive. If you look hard enough, you can dig up someone who is offended by anything of your choosing. Where does the balance lie between asking a staff member to relinquish their freedom of expression and trying to maintain a corporate image that clients will accept? The law on this is different all around the world, and social customs are often more restrictive still. I don't have any easy answers, but it is something we all need to consider. These questions will be asked of us sooner or later, and we had better have answers ready. My consulting company is maintaining a strictly hands-off policy for now. A personal social web account is personal. This is – mostly – accepted custom here in Canada. 

How are you handling it? ® Bootnote * Yes, I am aware of the irony in talking about the perpetuity of online speech while operating a Twitter account composed almost entirely of contentless blather. Source: Theregister

Buzzen Burps

no there is no exploits on that script as I have used it. It maybe something in the connection that pings you out. the script is a good script. The one that Im using is Ish and Sims socketless script. connection was made by err0r and the script is a nice and easy on the eyes. script is in white. or get soulfly.