Jump to content

seraphim

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by seraphim

  1. @ Cheif - Andrew, the use of "acquisiton" would imply that "possession" has been passed over from one party to another. Not only is Nathan smart enough to have explored all those avenues but I'm sure many months of talk went on and all parties were satisfied it would work, notwithstanding, err0r is on record as saying this is a merger.

     

    Monopoly or not, tis a done deal, pull up the big girl panties and focus on your network.

     

     

    @ Johnson - I wouldn't be weeping for Dippy, reason to follow. Not saying your other reasons are not valid, but I have no comment on that.

     

    @ Dippy - d00d, I helped you, and you spammed my email to craptastic porportions untill I was forced to blacklist you. Given that you spam everyone, your actions speak volumes. If you actually expect anyone to believe your lame woe-is-me pity party excuse for why Buzzen ditched you, hah NOT.going.to.happen!

×
×
  • Create New...