Jump to content

Google Doubles GMail Storage Space


DigitalX

Recommended Posts

anyone needing that kind of storage for emails should use pop3 accounts imo. At least now Google have provided its users with a much simpler way to transfer CD copies over the internet tongue.gif

 

Gmail does have POP3 smile.gif.

 

And my Gmail went up to 2052 MB, which is 2GB. So yes, it's applied.

 

The "Cool Thing" about Gmail is the way it does everything totally differently from every other email provider. And the fact that the ads don't suck. They're the only ads that I ever think about clicking (and sometimes I do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone needing that kind of storage for emails should use pop3 accounts imo. At least now Google have provided its users with a much simpler way to transfer CD copies over the internet tongue.gif

 

anyone needing that kind of storage for emails should use pop3 accounts imo. At least now Google have provided its users with a much simpler way to transfer CD copies over the internet tongue.gif

 

Considering you can only send up to 10mb attachments, very unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone needing that kind of storage for emails should use pop3 accounts imo. At least now Google have provided its users with a much simpler way to transfer CD copies over the internet tongue.gif

 

anyone needing that kind of storage for emails should use pop3 accounts imo. At least now Google have provided its users with a much simpler way to transfer CD copies over the internet tongue.gif

 

Considering you can only send up to 10mb attachments, very unlikely.

well considering you got a 10 MB per-email sending limit and your average song is 3-6MB and you got 2GB of storage and your average CD is 700MB or so it is possible if you send the CD track by track .......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, so they are wrong.

 

2GB = 2,147,483,648 bytes

2GB = 2,097,152 kilobytes

2GB = 2,048 megabytes

 

(worked out in case anyone doesn't know binary/byte computation)

 

2052 is still really, really close. I'm not complaining.

Edited by Ziggy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...